Showing posts with label Internet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Internet. Show all posts

Thursday, March 22, 2012

The Internet Economy is experiencing fast growth among G-20 countries.

Every business needs to “go digital.” Data about customers, competitors, suppliers, and employees are actually exploding. Ninety percent of all data were created in the past two years. By 2016, there will be 3 billion Internet users globally, and the Internet economy will reach $4.2 trillion in the G-20 nations.It appears that no company or country can afford to ignore this phenomenon. Scale and speed of change are altering industry structures and the way that companies do business. Farsighted companies, even ones in traditional industries, can separate the signals from the noise and create new sources of advantage by adopting digital strategies. For BCG, The “new” Internet is different in many ways from the old Internet. Here are 6 reasons followed by my comments

1-Its center of gravity is shifting. The Internet has become interactive and participatory. It is moving from fixed access to ubiquitous access. No longer limited to developed markets, it is growing by leaps and bounds in emerging markets, as well. And these countries are increasingly driving innovation.

Emerging countries are embracing digital innovations. A country like Kenya is a world leader in term of growth of the digital wallet.

2-It is now an “Internet of everything.” IBM predicts that 1 trillion devices will be connected to the Internet by 2015. The Internet of everything can radically change the ways companies interact with customers and run their supply chains. It also allows new entrants to attack the foundations of traditional industries.

It is a case of disruptive innovation as analyzed in the book Innovation Dilemma by Clayton Christensen.

3-It is about ecosystems. The Internet is increasingly being shaped by ecosystems orchestrated by companies such as Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google, but also by companies such as Baidu and Tencent in China and Yandex in Russia.

Complementors are increasingly important in the digital economy because of the presence of networks effects and switching costs. A good book on that issue is the Network Economy from Hal Varian and Carl Shapiro.

4-It is generating tremendous economic value. Across the G-20 nations, the Internet economy amounted to 4.1 percent of GDP, or $2.3 trillion, in 2010, larger than the economies of Italy or Brazil. In some leading economies, it is contributing up to 8 percent of GDP, powering economic growth and creating jobs.

The growth of the global ICT sector is one of the main drivers behind the growth in GDP of several economies

5- It has gone local. The Internet experience has become an ingrained feature of everyday life, reflecting national characteristics as well as economic, political, and social influences specific to individual countries.

In several countries mobile Internet through SMS, mobile app chat, smartphones, tablets and Wi-Fi has developed a culture of instantaneous conversation. Consumers and businesses are developing a dependency toward the mobile Internet. The negative aspect is that people expect rapid answers and decisions.

6- A new generation has grown up on the Internet. The “Millennials” have vastly different expectations as employees, consumers, and citizens. The Arab Spring protests and grass-roots “occupy” movements in the West are only the most visible manifestations of the power of the Millennials to shape society and commerce.

People less than 40 years old have grown up with several technologies: computers, Internet, video games, cellphones. For them these technologies are already user-friendly. A new generation of Internet entrepreneurs is growing quickly in emerging countries.

Consequences

BCG argues that these developments have four consequences for companies and policymakers alike.
1- Companies need to understand and strengthen their “digital balance sheets.” In an increasingly digital world, companies need to build their digital assets and reduce the digital liabilities, often organizational, that limit their ability to tap rich opportunities.

Companies must develop digital competencies to create new products and services.

2- Many companies require a digital transformation. Most will need to improve their people, processes, and organizational structures and adapt them to the digital world. Given the rapid pace of change and the intensity of competition, they will need to move away from long-term planning cycles and toward adaptive strategy setting.

Innovation is a main issue for many firms around the world. In order to create value, managers must use a good mix of internal growth and growth by acquisitions and incorporate a digital strategy in their business model.

3- Governments can help shape the digital economy. They can support policies related to investment, innovation, education, consumer protection, and privacy. In many areas, they should recognize that a hands-off approach is the best option.

Countries such as South Korea have largely promoted ICT and are now world leader in high-speed Internet

4- More than 15 years after the rallying cry was first heard, the Internet really is “changing everything.” As Walter Wriston, the legendary leader of Citibank, said in the 1980s, “Information about money has become almost as important as money itself.” That is true for every business today.

I can also add we now have an information overload. Analysts and web sites that help people to separate the wheat from the chaff in information are becoming more important than ever.


The growth

In the G-20 nations, the Internet economy will grow more than 10 percent a year through 2016, according to a new report published by The Boston Consulting Group (BCG) as part of its Connected World series.

In the developed markets of the G-20, the Internet economy will grow approximately 8 percent annually; in the developing markets, it will grow more than twice as fast—at an average annual rate of 18 percent. Argentina and India will grow the fastest, at 24 percent and 23 percent a year, respectively. The leading developed markets—Italy and the U.K.—will grow about 12 percent and 11 percent a year, respectively.

BCG projects that the Internet economy will contribute a total of $4.2 trillion to the G-20’s total GDP in 2016. “If it were a national economy, it would rank in the world’s top five, behind only the U.S., China, India, and Japan, and ahead of Germany,” said David Dean, BCG senior partner and a coauthor of the report.



Source : https://www.bcgperspectives.com/content/articles/growth_innovation_connected_world_digital_manifesto/

Louis Rhéaume
Infocom Intelligence
louis@infocomintelligence.com
Twitter: @InfocomAnalysis

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

A day in the Internet (infographic by MBAonline.com)

A Day in the Internet
Created by: MBA Online

Louis Rhéaume
Infocom Intelligence
louis@infocomintelligence.com
Twitter: @InfocomAnalysis

Thursday, January 19, 2012

Huffington Post will launch 24-Hour Online News Network in February

Recently, Reuters announced its web TV programming iniative with YouTube. Now, AOL’s Huffington Post Media Group is developing an even more robust online video offering for its own website: the Huffington Post Streaming Network, or HPSN. Presently, competitors are the Wall Street Journal and Fox News offer live online programming in the style of cable news, but only during the workday. Bloomberg also makes its live broadcast available for free on the iPad 24 hours per day, but most cable news operations only share short clips of their TV programming on the web.

Huffington Post Streaming Network can be view as a cable channel minus the subscription. Thus, the Huffington Post‘s existing editorial staff of 300+ will offer live commentary throughout the day, and the footage will later be cut into clips to be embedded throughout the site. Presumably we can expect to access the stream through the Huffington Post‘s apps as well.

Further information would be announced at a press event in New York City on Feb. 2.

Louis Rhéaume
Infocom Intelligence
louis@infocomintelligence.com
Twitter: @InfocomAnalysis

Sunday, December 11, 2011

The future of the Internet in 3 trends according to the CEO of Forrester Research

3 trends will influence considerably the Internet, according to the CEO of Forrester Research George Colony.

1-The Internet will offers more applications.
2-The social network sector is due for an important transformation.
3-The entreprise sector will adopt massively the social networks

So, social will still prosper but it will evolve a lot.

George Colony suggests that in each decade we saw the turnaround of a major infocom player. In the 1980's it was Intel, in the 1990's it was IBM, in the 2000's it was Apple and he suggests in 2010's it could be Microsoft, but it would necessitates a leadership transformation.

Social networks have reach maturation in term of users' time and penetration rate among population (over 80% in US and Canada for example).

Social start-ups who don't understand this new rule and consider there is a social bubble will disappear. Strong business models are pre-requisite for post-social survival.

In order to use the Internet more effectively and efficiently, Internet applications (web applications and mobile applications) will prosper.


Forrester provided a graph Total offerings versus Strategy of the major infocom players. While Apple is at the top with a strong offering and a strong strategy, luck helped also Steve Jobs. Apple did not really anticipate the proliferation of mobile apps. However, the business model of Apple could leverage that unanticipated new trend.

To watch the whole video from Le Web conference see:

http://youtu.be/2XZNsBz0aGw

Louis Rhéaume
Infocom Intelligence
louis@infocomintelligence.com
Twitter: @InfocomAnalysis

Monday, November 28, 2011

New internet entrepreneurs models: work is shifting toward a peer-to-peer model

According to VC Christina Cacioppo of Union Squares Ventures, today represents a very good time for new Internet Entrepreneurs. Access to capital is easier, there is a proliferation of tech incubators and a new trend is also very important: work is shifting toward a peer-to-peer model.

In a recent blog post she mentions:

"The first two decades of the modern internet broke industries built on distribution monopolies (e.g. music, news) and facilitated coordination between the consumer and the provider without the need for a middleman (e.g. hotels, car rentals.) The same will happen for a large fraction of our work, especially in cases where the work is standardized or employers "distribute" their workers to pools of customers.

One reason to create firms is the coordination and signaling problems of situations with imperfect information and transaction costs. As technology increases information flows and decreases transaction costs, individuals can leave their old employers and strike out on their own. Their livelihoods will still depend on providing valuable services in exchange for fees, but they'll do so as freelancers - and on their own, they'll capture more of the value generated by their work.

Just as blogs allowed talented writers to build audiences without being affiliated with large media organizations, and as Twitter and Tumblr allowed news- and tastemakers to succeed outside of established news or media properties, new web services will allow individuals to engage with customers without needing to work for a firm. These free agents, disaggregated and newly empowered, can promote and sustain themselves with new tools: Opez caters to service professionals, like bartenders and hairdressers, and allows them to build followings independent of their employers, while Vayable and SideTour provide marketing and transaction-processing for neighborhood tour guides. Hiptic helps graphic designers promote their work, while Zerply helps creative professionals do the same, and InterviewStreet lets programmers show off their skills.

As technology creates new free agents, it's also changing the notion of "work" to be less time- and location-specific. This is especially true of work that can be done easily at a distance. Workers who can't differentiate themselves using their reputation will be commoditized. This summer, web services were launched that allow you to order up a proofreader (Kibin), blogger (Contently), tutor (LearnBop), language partner (Verbling), car ride (Ridejoy), science researcher (Science Exchange), cooking instructor (Culture Kitchen), mystery shopper (SpotCheck), or transcriptionist (Mobile Works) from your browser. The Mechanical Turkification of work has begun.

Between identified, liberated individuals and the nameless, faceless drones of Mechanical Turk lies identity: does it matter who performs the task at hand? If the worker's background, skills, or experience matter, there's likely to be higher variance in demand for a particular person's services, and free agents will be sought after and chosen by reputation on services built for those purposes. Less-skilled people are likely better suited for tasks for which identity doesn't matter, and other marketplaces that don't include a concept of reputation will provide access to a global pool of workers."

A peer-to-peer model of work means that individuals can replace many SMEs or large firms in the delivery of specific mandates. With specialisation, individuals can offer a better ratio Quality/price than certains firms. With the Internet, mobile Internet and social networks, there are many opportunities for future Internet entrepreneurs.

Louis Rhéaume
Infocom Intelligence
louis@infocomintelligence.com
Twitter: @InfocomAnalysis

For more info read: http://www.usv.com/2011/11/what-comes-next.php

Tuesday, November 15, 2011

New study by McKinsey: The impact of the Internet on economic growth and prosperity

According to a new study by McKinsey, the Internet Sector is bigger than agriculture or utilities sector in the USA.

"The Internet has already served notice that it will be a disruptive force resolutely shaping the economy and society of the 21th century. But it can be a positive disruptor, supplying engines of growth to regions of the world that have been disadvantaged in the past, creating whole new industries from electrons and software code, and offering hope and opportunity to millions with its ability to spread knowledge, empower consumers, and organize social interactions.

As the aftermath of the global financial crisis challanges our government and business leaders to innovate as ever before, we should not lose sight of the enormous value of the Internet economy has already brought to rich and poor nations alike and its potential to boost growth across the globe".

Small and medium-sized firms using Web tecdhnologies extensively are growing more quickly and exporting more widely. It is true particularly in commerce and services industries.

Louis Rhéaume
Infocom Intelligence
louis@infocomintelligence.com
Twitter: @InfocomAnalysis

Friday, October 21, 2011

Article on Seeking Alpha: 5 stocks expected to gain from Internet trends

My new article on 5 stocks expected to gain from Internet trends has been published on Seeking Alpha.

http://seekingalpha.com/article/301081-5-companies-expected-to-gain-from-internet-trends

Louis Rhéaume
Infocom Intelligence
louis@infocomintelligence.com
Twitter: @InfocomAnalysis

Sunday, June 05, 2011

For Marc Andreessen "Mr. Internet" : we are not in a second tech bubble

For Marc Andreessen "Mr. Internet" : we are not in a second tech bubble. Marc is the founder of Netscape who created Internet with images. He is now a Venture capitalist involved in Groupon, Twitter, Facebook, Zynga. He is making a tons of millions in profits from its internet investments. He suggests that right now, major tech stocks are undervalued on the stock markets: for instance Cisco Systems, Apple, Microsoft. He said that Apple's Price-Earnings (PE) ratio is just 10 if you delete cash. He suggests that fast growing valuations of private and public stocks are not general, but in fact isolated, mainly in social networks (Faceboook, Zynga, Linkedin).

For Marc, new tech companies are trying to become profitable companies and not just new promising new IPOs (Initial Public Offerings) like firms in 1999-2000. They tend to have stronger business models than in the last decade.

For the whole interview on the Wall Street Journal see

http://online.wsj.com/video/groupon-investor-marc-andreessen-no-tech-bubble/275ED9C5-2BCA-4BFD-9FBA-97BCEF0D48F7.html

Louis Rhéaume
Infocom Intelligence
louis@infocomintelligence.com
Twitter: @InfocomAnalysis

Thursday, May 05, 2011

Skype’s founder now investing in venture capital

Niklas Zennstrom is a serial entrepreneur, which helped found online chat service Skype. He also created Peer-to –peer file-sharing website Kazaa in 2001. After selling Skype to eBay for $2.6 billion in 2005, Zennstrom and co-founder Janus Friis launched Joost, an online video service. Zennstrom is now involved on making venture capital investments in the technology space through his new firm Atomico.

Why do you think Skype succeeded, where so many other online chat services failed?

The team was very focused to make Skype's core product the global standard — “we had the ambition to become a global player.” Since previous VOIP solutions did not work well at all, we identified two major problems: technology and user experience. We found that Peer-to-peer technology was the solution to the technology problem. We had the best peer-to-peer technology experience in the world from Kazaa.

“We had perfect timing; we launched Skype for a broadband world, so we utilized high definition audio before anyone else… We went after a large market with a transformational business model, so there was a big opportunity.”

With VC Atomico we are looking for some precise characteristics in companies:

• entrepreneurs with global ambitions to become category winners,

• unique transformational products or business models,

• large markets in transition and finally the right timing.

What's the biggest mistake you made as an entrepreneur and what did you learn from it?

I try to move on when I make a mistake. I guess a major mistake I did was not to start my own company earlier. I spent nine years working for others before starting Kazaa in 2000.

What's the best investment you ever made?

That must have been taking my education seriously.

Source: http://www.cnbc.com/id/42892302?__source=stocktracker&par=stocktracker

Louis Rhéaume
Infocom Intelligence
louis@infocomintelligence.com
Twitter: @InfocomAnalysis

Monday, March 07, 2011

Skype will have a business model with advertising



Skype has just announced that they will provide occasional advertising to their subscribers.
Ads will be targeted only in the U.S., the U.K. and Germany at first. This would bring more revenue in preparation for a IPO (Initial Public Offering).

Skype says it has now 663 million subscribers and 8.8 million paid subscribers. Skype users made 207 billion minutes of voice and video calls during 2010, and in the fourth quarter, video calls accounted for approximately 42 percent of all Skype-to-Skype minutes. Furthermore, users sent more than 176 million text messages via Skype.

Revenues grew to $860 million for the year ended Dec. 31, up from $719 million in 2009 (combining the 2009 results of Skype pre-spinoff from eBay and post-spinoff). The company is still not making profit: it had a net loss of $6.9 million.

According to Skype's management their is a risk: "our users may respond negatively to receiving advertisements through their Skype software client, which could negatively and materially affect user engagement, our Skype brand and our results of operations.”

Skype admits that negative publicity around the temporary shut down of its network for a day (last year), might hurt its ability to launch a product targeting businesses: “As we increasingly introduce products particularly targeted at enterprise customers, for whom system stability is a critical factor, any system failures could have a significant impact on our ability to attract or maintain our relationships with enterprise customers.”

Source: http://newenterprise.allthingsd.com/20110307/skype-updates-its-pre-ipo-numbers-plans-to-sell-display-ads/

Louis Rhéaume
Infocom Intelligence
louis@infocomintelligence.com

Saturday, March 05, 2011

Groupe iWeb sera privatisé

Il y a 2 ans, dans un commentaire précédant je recommandais fortement le Groupe iWeb (IWB.TO)
http://infocomanalysis.blogspot.com/2009/01/le-groupe-iweb-le-futur-wal-mart-de.html

Hier, la direction a annoncé que la compagnie serait privatisée à 1.50$ l'action avec une offre d'un fonds d'investissement, qui est supporté par les principaux actionnaires (qui sont aussi les dirigeants). Comme Netgraphe, il y a quelques années, qui a été privatisé par Quebecor, le secteur Internet est en forte croissance et les nouveaux propriétaires vont garder 100% de tous les futurs profits du Groupe iWeb en retirant la compagnie de la bourse. Je suis client et actionnaire du Groupe iWeb depuis 2007 et j'en suis très satisfait des 2 côtés.

Le titre a été recommandé dans ce blogue à 0.70$ et rapportera 114% à ceux qui l'ont acheté à ce prix, il y a 2 ans.

Louis Rhéaume
Infocom Intelligence
louis@infocomintelligence.com

Monday, January 31, 2011

2010 State of the Internet by Mashable

Here is in a big picture, the state of the Internet for 2010 by Mashable.

Louis Rhéaume
Infocom Intelligence
louis@infocomintelligence.com

Thursday, January 13, 2011

Some key Internet statistics of 2010

The number of emails sent on the internet in 2010 (if we delete spam) was around 11.7 trillion.
294 billion – Average number of email messages per day.
1.88 billion – The number of email users worldwide.
480 million – New email users since the year before.
262 billion – The number of spam emails per day (assuming 89 percent are spam).
2.9 billion – The number of email accounts worldwide.
25 percent – Share of email accounts that are corporate.
Websites
255 million – The number of websites as of December 2010.
21.4 million – Added websites in 2010.
Domain names
88.8 million – .COM domain names at the end of 2010.
13.2 million – .NET domain names at the end of 2010.
8.6 million – .ORG domain names at the end of 2010.
79.2 million – The number of country code top-level domains (e.g. .CN, .UK, .DE, etc.).
202 million – The number of domain names across all top-level domains (October 2010).
7 percent – The increase in domain names since the year before.
Internet users
1.97 billion – Internet users worldwide (June 2010).
14 percent – Increase in internet users since the previous year.
825.1 million – internet users in Asia.
475.1 million – internet users in Europe.
266.2 million – internet users in North America.
204.7 million – internet users in Latin America / Caribbean.
110.9 million – internet users in Africa.
63.2 million –internet users in the Middle East.
21.3 million – internet users in Oceania / Australia.
Social media
152 million – The number of blogs on the Internet (as tracked by BlogPulse).
25 billion – Number of sent tweets on Twitter in 2010
100 million – New accounts added on Twitter in 2010
175 million – People on Twitter as of September 2010
7.7 million – People following @ladygaga (Lady Gaga, Twitter’s most followed user).
600 million – People on Facebook at the end of 2010.
250 million – New people on Facebook in 2010.
30 billion – Pieces of content (links, notes, photos, etc.) shared on Facebook per month.
70 percent – Share of Facebook’s user base located outside the United States.
20 million – The number of Facebook apps installed each day.
Videos
2 billion – The number of videos watched per day on YouTube.
35 – Hours of video uploaded to YouTube every minute.
186 – The number of online videos the average internet user watches in a month (USA).
84 percent – Share of internet users who view videos online (USA).
14 percent – Share of internet users who have uploaded videos online (USA).
2+ billion – The number of videos watched per month on Facebook.
20 million – Videos uploaded to Facebook per month.
Images
5 billion – Photos hosted by Flickr (September 2010).
3000+ – Photos uploaded per minute to Flickr.
130 million – At the above rate, the number of photos uploaded per month to Flickr.
3+ billion – Photos uploaded per month to Facebook.
36 billion – At the current rate, the number of photos uploaded to Facebook per year.
Source: VentureBeat
Louis Rhéaume
Infocom Intelligence
louis@infocomintelligence.com

Sunday, December 26, 2010

The most important applications of the Internet

Business Week just published a list of the most important applications (most used) of the web in 2010.

Application     Traffic share
Category

1-Data                    28.1%
2-Online video        26.2%
3-P2P File sharing   24.9%
4-Other file sharing   18.7%
5-Voice and video     1.7%
communications
6-PC Gaming            0.7%
7-E-mail and Instant   0.3%
Messaging
8-Gaming Consoles    0.2%

It appears that streaming video (both TV and movies) has surpassed peer-to-peer sharing (which are mostly pirated files), and will become the largest volume of video traffic on the Web, according to Cisco Systems.

Louis Rhéaume
Infocom Intelligence
louis@infocomintelligence.com

Monday, December 06, 2010

Does new media has actually the same value as old media?

The CEO of Business Insider suggests that new media has actually almost the same value as old media.
http://venturebeat.com/page/4/

It appears, according to Heny Blodget, that: "new media companies running the gamut from Google to Gawker Media are now collectively worth $289 billion — nearly as much as the total market value, $296 billion, of traditional media companies like Time Warner, Disney, and News Corp. The two groups are “neck and neck”.



Blodget adds, content isn’t king: “Content plus distribution is king.  Blodget made the observation in opening remarks for Business Insider’s Ignition 2010 conference in New York City on December 2th.  
In Bloget's valuation, Google makes the most of new media value.  However, It is true that growing new media such as Huffington Post is valued around $112 million by 24/7 Wall Street,
and Gawker Properties value is around $300 million,  Perez Hilton, $44 million, Drudge Report. $42 million, and  TechCrunch was sold for $25M to AOL recently.
Louis Rheaume
Infocom Intelligence
louis@infocomintelligence.com

Sunday, November 21, 2010

What 2 of the best Venture capitalists are saying on the future of the Internet ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBvuirDPHKA&feature=player_embedded

Last week, 2 of the best Tech VC (venture capitalist) gave their perspective on the Internet for the Web 2.0 Techcrunch summit.  John Doerr of Kleiner Perkins, the man behind the success of Netscape, Facebook and Google just to name a few; and Fred Wilson of Union Square Ventures who made the deal of Zynga made very interesting remarks on the future of the Internet.

For Wilson, we are in the middle of a second Internet stock market bubble.  I agree with him, but I think we are at the beginning (see post http://infocomanalysis.blogspot.com/2010/10/are-we-entering-in-second-internet.html). For Doerr we are just in a boom period of a third waves of value creation and innovation about Internet.  For Wilson, tech VC firms are seeing a lot of firms which copy the strategy of others.  Thus, there are a lot right now of "Me too" business models.  For instance, a lot of firms try to copy the success of  Groupon in local daily social networks deals.  It is similar to what happened in telephony in the 1990's where CLECS (Competitive Local Exchanges Carriers) had almost all the same strategy and business models.  The vast majority went in bankruptcy following the burst of the 2000 tech stock bubble.

According to Wilson only 10% of firms in a VC portfolio should go public, the best ones only.  The rest  should try to sell  to others firms.

For Doerr, the Silicon Valley is still the place where important Internet platforms still emerge and grow.  For him, it has never been a better time to start a tech firm than today.  Valuations are high and VC money is largely available.

For Wilson, a very hot sector right now is the combination between mobile and social networks.  One can think of the potential of Twitter and Groupon for instance in this sector.  He adds that Android will become the dominant platform on mobile because of its open standard platform versus Apple and Research in Motion (RIM and its Blackberry).  Application developpers can create more easily value on this platform.  Wilson proposes that Apple is like the "cable providers" business model of mobile Internet.

Doerr suggests that Facebook, is the strongest firm on execution of the Internet with Google, Apple, and Amazon.

Wilson suggests that Facebook did not create much innovation.  Furthermore, the only complementor of its platform, which created a lot of value is Zynga. He also suggests that Google is the best tech acquirer since a decade.

John Doerr had the final word.  He cited Colin Powell who said: "Innovation without execution is hallucination".

Louis Rhéaume
Infocom Intelligence
louis@infocomintelligence.com

Friday, May 29, 2009

La Corée Du Sud: leader en technologies de l'information et des communications



Selon le site web TelecomFlash, la Corée du Sud était l'un des pays les moins développés en infocom dans le monde dans les années 80. Ainsi l'infrastructure en télécom du pays avait seulement 7% de télé-densité. Dans les années 90, le pays a incesti pour devenir une société de l'information avec d'excellents infrastructures e-gouvernement, l'essor du e-commerce et l'offre de services innovateurs de l'Internet. Le pays est devenu un incubateur d'innovation et un grand exportateur de services et produits infocom.


Le pays est le leader mondial depuis 2001 en terme de vitesse et de pénétration de services Internet haute-vitesse. 90% des ménages ont accès à l'Internet et 69% des connections se font à plus de 5 Mpbs. 73% de la population de 6 ans et plus ont Internet. Le cellulaire rejoint 95% de la population.


Le pays a décidé que les TIC était une de leur priorité et ils ont investi autant dans les infrastructures que dans l'éco-système. Ce fut une collaboration entre les gouvernement, le milieu académique et le secteur privé. Pour bâtir une masse critique, le gouvernement a favorisé des bas prix dans le secteur public et l'accès gratuit à l'Internet dans les écoles. La forte demande a poussé les fournisseurs de TIC à offrir également des bas prix et la clientèle s'est rapidement éduquée en terme de littérature technologique. 44% du marché de la fibre optique (maison/commerce) asiatique est en Corée du Sud.


Le pays a déjà mis en branle un plan pour investir 24.6 milliard de dollars US en TIC pour créer 120 000 emplois et mettre à jour les services de télévision numérique et les rendre plus interactif pour le e-commerce et pour l'éducation à la maison.


Les Coréens du Sud sont bien tech-savvy, de grand consommateurs de TIC. Pour 33% d'entre eux, l'accès au services de télévision par cellulaire est important. Aidé par les efforts du gouvernement, les fournisseurs de TIC en Corée du Sud ont rendu le marché des données (data market) très abordable, ce qui ouvre la porte grande ouverte pour lancer des services à valeur ajoutée pour le cellulaire, l'Internet et la télévision numérique.


Louis Rhéaume

Infocom Intelligence


Tuesday, October 07, 2008

Branchez-Vous partie 2

La compagnie Branchez-Vous! a fait une offre d'achat pour NetWorld Media qui ferait de la nouvelle entité le plus grand réseau publicitaire indépendant sur Internet au Canada.

http://www.branchez-vous.com/inc/communiques/2008/10/branchez-vous_projette_da.html

NetWorld Media a eu des ventes de 4.5 M$ dans la dernière année fiscale Avril 2008, tandis que Branchez-Vous! a eu des ventes de 4.3M$ pour l'année se terminant en Décembre 2007.

La transaction sera entièrement payée en actions de BV! qui sont largement sous-évalués en ces temps de turbulence boursière. Le prix de l'acquisition est de 4.6M$ en actions à 0.16$ l'action, ce qui vaut seulement 1.07X les ventes. C'est à la fois un très bon investissement pour les actionnaires de Networld Media et pour les actionnaires de BV! Bien qu'à court terme les coûts d'intégration vont influencer les résultats de BV!, à moyen terme les occasions de croissance sont très intéressantes. La direction de BV! pourra compter sur les anciens dirigeants de NetWorld Media.

La direction de BV! suggère que la transaction sera profitable dès la première année. Le bénéfice net sera sûrement négligeable, mais dès 2009 le titre de Branchez-Vous! sera à surveiller pour son potentiel de croissance. Au lendemain de la transaction le titre est passé de 0.12$ à 0.23$ puisque le chiffre d'affaires allait doubler. Il est difficile d'avoir un prix cible pour BV! mais le potentiel de gain est de plus de 40% par année s'il est conservé pendant 3-4 ans. Pour ce faire il faut avoir les reins solide puisque c'est évidemment un titre très volatile. Le potentiel de croissance de la publicité sur Internet est à l'adolescence et croîtra rapidement, et ce malgré une récession à court terme.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Mise à jour : Branchez-Vous! a été vendu à Rogers pour 25M$, soit 0.40$ l'action.  Félicitations à ceux qui ont suivi notre recommandation d'achat.

Louis Rhéaume
Infocom Intelligence

Sunday, June 08, 2008

Un titre Internet à surveiller pour investisseur à long terme: Branchez-Vous! (BZV-V)

Un titre Internet à surveiller pour investisseur à long terme est la firme québécoise Branchez-Vous! Un des rares "pure play" media Internet au Canada. Il est le joueur indépendant le plus intéressant depuis Netgraphe, intégré à 100% depuis à Quebecor Media.

BRANCHEZ-VOUS!, c’est aujourd’hui :
-le plus grand réseau publicitaire de sites Internet au Québec, le Réseau BRANCHEZ-VOUS!, qui compte plus de 50 sites et touche chaque mois trois millions de Québécois;un nouveau réseau publicitaire de sites en anglais au Canada,
le BZV Network;

-le principal portail d’information indépendant au Québec, BRANCHEZ-VOUS.com, consulté chaque mois par plus de 700 000 Canadiens francophones – dont un grand nombre de professionnels des technologies; et
-la première webtélé indépendante du Québec – BRANCHEZ-VOUS.tv pour l’information

Bien sûr Branchez-vous.com n'a pas le même traffic que Canoe.com. Par contre, la firme a des attraits bien à elle. Elle a depuis environ un an une nouvelle webtélé qui peut devenir intéressante selon les contenus choisis. Pour le moment c'est assez disparate et il y a une vingtaine de reportages par thème.

Cependant, Branchez-Vous a développé une expertise pour l'information techno et avec plus d'analyse elle peut devenir une référence indépendante sur les technologies de l'information et des communications. Le portail http://www.branchez-vous.com/ se veut un portail généraliste essayant de séduire une panoplie d'internautes. La firme devrait se concentrer sur quelques crénaux pour apporter plus de valeur ajoutée aux internautes et aux annonceurs. Le côté affaires et finance par ailleurs est plus faible tout comme certains autres thèmes couvert par le portail.

La firme a engagé un nouveau chef des finances. Espérons qu'il mettra l'accent sur la rentabilité et la croissance de la firme. Pour le dernier trimestre financier, BZV a déçu avec des ventes en hausse de 9% seulement. La firme n'a pas de dettes et met l'accent sur le développement de partenariats pour élargir sa gamme de contenus.

Denièrement, BZV a fait des acquisitions de site webs indépendants:

2 avril 2008 - BRANCHEZ-VOUS! annonce la clôture de l'acquisition des sites Showbizz.net et Matin.qc.ca
31 mars 2008 - BRANCHEZ-VOUS! et l'Office québécois de la langue française lancent JOUEZenfrancais.ca pour faire connaître les jeux vidéo en français
17 mars 2008 - BRANCHEZ-VOUS! acquiert Fanatique.ca, troisième site québécois de sports, et HumourQuebec.com, premier site québécois d'humour

La firme a offert de minces profits depuis quelques années (0.01 $ par action en 2007) mais son cycle de vie est toujours en croissance. Il y a aura de plus en plus de publicités sur Internet, il suffit de rejoindre des crénaux suffisamment intéressants pour rejoindre des segments d'internautes qui attirera des annonceurs. Elle réussi présentement avec l'actualité techno, mais tire de la patte par exemple dans l'actualité affaires et finances.

On peut lire les faits saillants au http://www.branchez-vous.com/inc/investisseurs/faits_saillants.html

L'action de la compagnie s'est transigé à 0.16$ pour 3-4 transactions la semaine passée après l'annonce de ses nouveaux états financiers décevants. À ce prix la compagnie se transigeait pour une valeur boursière de seulement 4.6M$ sur des ventes de 4.3M$ en 2007. Ainsi, la firme se vendait à environ 1X seulement les ventes de 2008. Le titre est donc très volatile et très peu suivi par les analystes financiers des firmes de courtage.

Définitivement un titre à surveiller pour investisseur à long terme qui s'intéresse à la publicité et aux médias Internet "pure play".


Last Updated: 06 Jun 2008
Rolling 52 Week High
0.850
Rolling 52 Week Low
0.160
Total Number of Shares
30,261,015
Shares in Escrow
0
Net Shares Outstanding
30,261,015
Float Quoted Market Value
9,229,610

l.ouis Rhéaume

Infocom Intelligence

louis75@sympatico.ca

http://www.infocomintelligence.com/

Tuesday, November 28, 2006

Les défis des journaux imprimés face à l'Internet

Un article de The Economist(1) rappelle que les efforts déployés par les journaux traditionnels vers l’Internet ont rapporté peu, jusqu’ici en moyenne. Il semble que les journaux en ligne qui ont réussi, offrent du contenu et/ou des services originaux.


Par exemple, Schibsted, un journal norvégien tire maintenant 35% de ses profits de l’Internet. Il faut dire qu’ils offrent également
Sesam, un engin de recherche pour concurrencer Google et FINN.no, un portail d’annonces classées.


iMedia prédit que le quart des annonces imprimées sera transféré aux médias en ligne d’ici les 10 prochaines années. Historiquement, les joueurs de medias traditionnels ont peu investi en recherche et développement et ont fait peu d’expérimentation et de changements. Comme dit Warren Buffet, “Pensez-vous que les journaux existeraient dans leur forme actuelle, si Internet avait existé avant les journaux?”. L’industrie fait donc face à des changements profonds.


Au début, de 1995 à 2002, les journaux ont simplement reproduit leur contenu imprimé sur Internet. Pourtant, l’Internet offrant une multitude de sources de renseignement, les lecteurs prennent leur information dans plusieurs sites spécialisés. Ainsi, les portails et journaux en ligne qui se font généraliste et qui offre peu de qualité dans une multitude de domaines font fausse route. Les journaux et magazine en ligne se doivent d’étendre leur activité et d’utiliser des caméras et microphones pour produire des vidéos et des podcasts. Une grande valeur ajoutée est d’offrir du contenu complémentaire sur un sujet bien précis. De plus, offrir un contenu de qualité veut dire aussi engager de bons journalistes et non pas des stagiaires pour le contenu en ligne.


Un des défis des journaux en ligne est le fait qu’un lecteur en ligne ne rapporte pas autant qu’un lecteur imprimé. Il y a le prix du journal imprimé comme facteur et le fait qu’un internaute regarde moins de pages qu’un lecteur traditionnel.


Des recherches sur les goûts des lecteurs rapportent que les gens aiment surtout des histoires courtes, des nouvelles pertinentes à leurs yeux : reportage local, sports, divertissement, météo et trafic. Par contre, sur Internet les gens aiment surtout lire sur des sujets qui vont améliorer leur qualité de vie.


Il y a une bien mauvaise habitude des médias en ligne de prendre des nouvelles d’une grande agence de nouvelles (Ex. Reuters, Presse Canadienne), ce qui fait que peu importe si vous allez sur Cyberpresse, Branchez-Vous ou Canoe, plusieurs nouvelles nationales ou internationales se ressemblent énormément ou sont carrément identiques.


Pour survivre et ralentir l’hémorragie de la perte de lecteurs les journaux traditionnels doivent se spécialiser, augmenter leur prix et investir dans un meilleur éditorial. Bien des gens sont prêts à payer plus pour une meilleure analyse de l’actualité.


Au Québec, certains journaux offrent un contenu d’une certaine qualité comme
www.ledevoir.com qui vient de faire une belle métamorphose en ligne et www.cyberpresse.ca . Le Journal de Montréal va se séparer de Canoe et avoir sa propre entité en ligne. La distribution de quotidiens gratuits comme Metro et l’autre filiale 24 Heures de Quebecor a sûrement beaucoup affecté la rentabilité du Journal de Montréal. Je ne dois pas être le seul qui n’a pas acheté le Journal de Montréal depuis 5 ans. Cependant, pour l’avoir lu chez le barbier à quelques reprises je dois avouer que le contenu a été amélioré depuis quelques années, mais pas encore assez pour me donner le goût de l’acheter…

Les journaux en ligne devraient penser sérieusement à fractionner leur contenu, offrir un abonnement à rabais pour l’accès à certaines sections seulement et diversifier leur revenus en vendant des services complémentaires à la vente de publicité en ligne et d’annonces classées. Les nouveaux services mobiles offriront de superbes opportunités de croissance à ceux qui offriront du contenu original de qualité pour les smartphones, les cellulaires, les ordinateurs avec puce Wifi ou WiMAX et lecteurs MP3 Wifi.


(1) The Economist print edition, More media, less news, Aug 24th 2006

Louis Rhéaume
Infocom Intelligence
infocom@videotron.ca